site stats

Etepha v. director of patents

WebBrewery, Inc. v. Court of Appeals', Appellant contended that by apPlyir 9 the test of dominancy, the words L.A. and LA, assuming that they are the dominant ... the cases of Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. 9 (ATUSSIN v. PE TUSSIN), Mead Johnson & Co. v. N.V.J. van Dorp Ltd. 10 (ALASKA v. ALACTA) Cyanamid v. Director of Patents, et al. 11 WebSep 19, 2024 · ETEPHA v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS + DECISION 123 Phil. 329 SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent Office? …

G.R. No. L-26557 February 18, 1970 - AMERICAN WIRE & CABLE COMPANY v ...

WebPatent in Ethiopia. Patent is a legal form of protection that provides a person or legal entity with exclusive rights to exclude others from making, using, or selling a concept or … WebDec 29, 1995 · [26] Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). [27] Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. [28] 224 SCRA 437 (1993). [29] Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. Director of Patents, 100 Phil. 214 (1956); American Wire & Cable Co. v. Director of Patents, 31 … is that okay 意味 https://empireangelo.com

Etepha v. Director of Patents PDF Trademark Property Law - S…

WebRelying on the doctrine enunciated in the Etepha case 7 and the earlier ruling in Lim Hoa vs. Director of Patents, 8 applicant-appellee contends that the DYNAFLEX mark would not confuse or deceive the buyers and subscribers of the DURAFLEX brand, because electrical wires are of great value and the purchasers thereof are generally intelligent ... WebThe definition laid down in Dy Buncio v. Tan Tiao Bok is better suited to the present case. There, the 'ordinary purchaser' was defined as one 'accustomed to buy, and therefore to some extent familiar with, the goods in question. ... (Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495). The legislature has enacted laws to regulate the use of trademarks ... WebDec 29, 1995 · 26 Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). chanrobles virtual law library. 27 Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. chanrobles virtual law library. 28 224 SCRA 437 (1993). chanrobles virtual law library. 29 Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. is that ok for you ビジネス

G.R. No. L-20635 - Lawphil

Category:SERI SOMBOONSAKDIKUL v. ORLANE S.A. - Lawyerly

Tags:Etepha v. director of patents

Etepha v. director of patents

ETEPHA V DIRECTOR OR PATENTS.pdf - Course Hero

WebThe Director of Patents ruled that the trademark ATUSSIN may be registered even though PERTUSSIN had been previously registered from the same office, hence, this appeal. ISSUE: Whether or not ATUSSIN … WebView 34 Etepha v. Director of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks March 31, 1966

Etepha v. director of patents

Did you know?

WebFeb 1, 2024 · Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. [82] finds application in this case. In Etepha, we ruled that there is no confusing similarity between PERTUSSIN and ATUSSIN. The Court considered among other factors the aural differences between the two marks as follows: 5. As we take up Pertussin and Atussin once again, we cannot escape notice of … WebEtepha VS Director OF Patents A case in Intellectual Property Law - ETEPHA, A., petitioner, vs - StuDocu A case digest in Intellectual Property Law with focus on …

WebPerez, 154 Phil. 371 (1974) [Per J. Makasiar, First Division], Etepha, A.G. v. Director of Patents, 123 Phil. 329 (1966) [Per J. Sanchez, En· Banc]. 376 Phil. 628 ( 1999) [Per J. Pono, First Division], / Dissenting Opinion 3 G.R. Nos. 196372, 210224, 216104 & 219632 5 In the Middle Ages, the use of many kinds of marks on a variety of ... WebView ETEPHA V DIRECTOR OR PATENTS.pdf from LAW 101 at Philippine Christian University. EN BANC [G.R. No. L-20635. March 31, 1966.] ETEPHA, A.G. , petitioner, vs ...

WebSince the new constitution of Ethiopia enacted in 1995, Ethiopia's legal system consisted of federal law with bicameral legislature. The House of People's Representatives (HoPR) … http://www.onlineservices.ipophil.gov.ph/ipcaselibrary/ipcasepdf/AP_IPC_14-2006-000023_Decision.pdf

WebG.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RESPONDENTS.D E C I S I O N SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent …

WebCorp. v. Director of Patents". The Appellant also claims that the ruling of the Supreme Court in Ong Ai Cui v. Director ofPhilippine Patent Office" cited by the Director, far from ... CA,G.R. No. 114508, 19 Nov. 1999, citing Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966), Gabriel v. Perez, 55 SCRA406 (1974). Nestle v. New Zealand Page 3 of8 . is that ok to offroad at big bear nowWebEtepha v. Director of Patents, et al.82 finds application in this case. In Etepha, we ruled that there is no confusing similarity between PERTUSSIN and ATUSSIN. The Court … igg recent or past exposureWebEtepha v. Director of Patents .docx - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. is that ok with you meaningWebEste articulo presenta los métodos actualmente disponibles para la evaluación de proyectos, dejando de manifiesto las falencias de los métodos tradicionales como el Método de Flujos de Caja Descontados, cuando son usados para evaluar proyectos con alta incertidumbre, donde además los administrativos cuentan con la flexibilidad suficiente … ig group graduate schemeWebEtepha v. Director of Patents (G. No. L-20635) Issue: Whether or not petitioner’s trademark is registrable. Ruling: YES. That the word “tussin” figures as a component of both trademarks is nothing to wonder at. The Director of Patents aptly observes that it … is that okay ビジネスWebThis is a petition for review assailing the Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 24101, [1] reversing and setting aside the decision of the Bureau of Patents, Trademarks and Technology Transfer (BPTTT), [2] which denied private respondent's application for registration of the trade-mark, FLAVOR MASTER. On January 18, 1984, private … is that ok synonymWebDIRECTOR OF PATENTS and WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., respondents. McClure, Salas and Gonzalez, for petitioner. Sycip, Salazar, Manalo, Luna and … is that ok to you