Hardev singh vs gurmail singh
WebLegislative Assembly elections were held in the Indian state of Punjab in 1992 to elect the members of the Punjab Legislative Assembly. Chief Minister Beant Singh (Chief Minister) was elected as the leader of the ruling party. [1] Voter turnout [ edit] Urban-Rural turnout 1992 [ edit] SOURCE : India Today, 15 March 1992 WebFeb 2, 2007 · Supreme Court of India. February 2, 2007. Hardev Singh Vs. Gurmail Singh (Dead) by LRs. Appeal: Civil Appeal No. 6222 of 2000 [From the Judgment and final Order dated 9-4-1999 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at …
Hardev singh vs gurmail singh
Did you know?
Web19.08.2014, the said appeal qua the surviving appellants – Gurmail Singh, Kewal Singh and Karnail Singh was dismissed and the conviction and the sentences were confirmed. Though WebDec 20, 2010 · Description: PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION FILED BY PETITIONER KAUR, RAJINDERPAL AS TO RESPONDENT SINGH, GURMAIL SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED. : Date: July 22, 2010. Type: Docket Event. Description: APPLICATION PENDING FOR WAIVER OF COURT FEES AND COSTS PURSUANT TO G.C. 68633, CRC 3.51, …
WebHardev Singh Vs. Gurmail Singh (S.B.Sinha & Markandey Katju JJ.) 02.02.2007 ... Indisputably, during pendency of the said suit, Harcharan Singh sold the said land to the respondent herein by a deed of sale dated 17.3.1982 and he had been given possession thereof. Another suit was filed by Udham Kaur. The appellant, in the suit, inter alia ... WebHarcharan Singh, the original Defendant No.1, allegedly transferred some properties in favour of his wife Udham Kaur in lieu of maintenance pursuant to a compromise entered into by and between them. She claimed herself to be the absolute owner thereof in terms of Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act. 1956.
WebJan 18, 2024 · Hardev Singh vs. Gurmail Singh; In this case, the question was about a property given by the defendant to the appellant in lieu of maintenance, followed to a compromise between the parties. The Court stated that Section 52 merely prohibits a property transfer, it does not indicate that a pendente lite transfer would be illegal. WebHARDEV SINGH Vs. GURMAIL SINGH - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - February 02, 2007 ... HARDEV SINGH Vs. GURMAIL SINGH. LAWS(SC)-2007-2-140 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Decided on February 02,2007 HARDEV SINGH Appellant. VERSUS GURMAIL SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. Respondents. Referred Judgements :-JLIRNINA …
WebAug 4, 2024 · Hardev Singh v/s Harpreet Kaur & Ors Facts: In the present case, Appellant (Hardev Singh) and Respondent (Harpreet Kaur) have married each other without the consent of their parents. Due to the problems created by the parents of Respondent, they sought police protection. High Court in lieu of the same granted protection order.
http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/hardev-singh-vs-gurmail-singh-dead-by-lrs ezekias meaningWebFeb 2, 2007 · Hardev Singh Vs. Gurmail Singh (Dead) By Lrs [2007] Insc 87 (2 February 2007) S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju . S.B. Sinha, J. This appeal raises an interesting question of law in regard to interpretation of Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 ("the Act", for short).. Harcharan Singh, the original Defendant No.1, allegedly … hha pca trainingWebBabbar Khalsa. Bhai Gurmail Singh Babbar was in the house of Sardar Joga Singh and from the womb of Mata Ajmer Kaur in September 1957 in the village Raipur. Bhai Sahib had 2 brothers and 2 sisters also. Bhai Sahib completed his primary education at the local school of Raipur and later passed his metric with flying grades. ezekiel010609WebThe brief facts of the case are that applicant Hardev Singh is the husband of respondent No. 3 Maya Devi who filed an application Under Section 123 Cr.P.C. for maintenance against her husband. The applicant did not appear before the Court below and, therefore, the Court proceeded ex parte and on 25.4.91 Hardev Singh was ordered to pay Rs. 500 ... ezekial francis masoyaFeb 2, 2007 · ezekial dann florekWebFeb 2, 2007 · In fact, from the judgment of the courts below, it does not appear that any finding has been arrived at to the effect that the respondent herein was aware that the said Harcharan Singh had no title over the property. 22. Our attention has, however, been drawn to a decision of this Court in Kartar Singh v. ezekial boneWebIN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 6222 of 2000 Hardev Singh …PETITIONER Vs Gurmail Singh (Dead) by LRs …RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/2007 BENCH: S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju J U D G M E N T S.B. Sinha, J. This appeal raises an interesting question of law in regard to interpretation […] ezekids